Zurück zum BlogPPWR

    PPWR supplier declarations: what actually counts as evidence?

    10. September 20267 min read

    Dieser Artikel ist derzeit nur auf Englisch verfügbar.

    Packaging samples and a supplier declaration ready for compliance review

    Since Regulation (EU) 2025/40 (PPWR) became generally applicable on 12 August 2026, buyers have been asking suppliers for 'your PPWR declaration' — and suppliers have been answering with company-wide PDFs.

    Can such a company-level letter prove your packaging complies? No. Article 39(2) requires the EU declaration of conformity to follow the Annex VIII model — and that model identifies the specific packaging covered by a unique identification. A letterhead statement that a supplier 'complies with the PPWR' names no packaging, so it demonstrates nothing about yours.

    Why are blanket 'PPWR declarations' suddenly everywhere?

    The pattern is a chain reaction. A brand owner or distributor hears that the regulation applies and emails every supplier: 'please send your PPWR declaration'. The supplier's sales team has no per-reference conformity file at hand, so it produces what it can produce in an afternoon: a letter stating the company takes the regulation seriously. The buyer files the PDF and considers the box ticked. Nobody in that chain has produced or received evidence about any specific packaging.

    A file of company letters creates the feeling of compliance while leaving every packaging reference exactly as undocumented as before. When the file is eventually read — by a market surveillance authority, a large customer's compliance team, or an acquirer's due-diligence lawyers — it is read reference by reference, because that is how the regulation is written.

    What is an EU declaration of conformity under the PPWR?

    It is the document in which the responsible operator declares, on its own responsibility, that a specific packaging meets the requirements of Regulation (EU) 2025/40. It is drawn up under Article 39, follows the Annex VIII model, and is backed by the technical documentation described in Annex VII. One declaration covers one packaging — never a whole company.

    A company-wide letterhead attaches to the company and demonstrates nothing about any packaging. A marketing or scheme certificate ('certified sustainable packaging') attaches to the scheme's own criteria and can at most feed your technical file. Only a per-packaging declaration — and the underlying data on materials, substances and recyclability — is evidence you can actually file.

    What should a valid declaration contain?

    A declaration you can rely on identifies the packaging first. Reading the Annex VIII model, the elements to look for are concrete:

    • A unique identification of the packaging — a reference, name or description that maps to the packaging you buy
    • The identity of the operator taking responsibility — name and address
    • The regulation named in full — Regulation (EU) 2025/40, not 'applicable EU packaging rules'
    • A conformity statement about that packaging — not about the company's intentions or values
    • Place, date and a named signatory — the date matters when a packaging changes

    Red flags to watch for

    The red flags are the mirror image: no packaging identified, 'all our products' as scope, no reference to the regulation's number, or a signature block replaced by a marketing footer. One test catches most blanket letters: if the same PDF could be sent to every customer of the company without changing a word, it does not identify your packaging.

    Does a supplier declaration replace your own obligations?

    No. A supplier document is input evidence, never a transfer of responsibility: the operator that places the packaging on the market answers for that packaging's conformity. If that operator is you, you draw up your own declaration backed by your own Annex VII technical documentation — and what you need from your supplier is data, not reassurance.

    Three families of data dominate in practice: composition by material and weight; substances information under Article 5 (including the 100 mg/kg limit for lead, cadmium, mercury and hexavalent chromium, and the restriction on intentionally added PFAS in food-contact packaging); and the design data your recyclability assessment under Article 6 depends on.

    What to ask your supplier for instead

    • Ask per reference, not per company — name the packaging reference or SKU in the request
    • Ask for the declaration that identifies that packaging — point to the Annex VIII model
    • Ask for the data behind it — material composition by weight, Article 5 substances information, recyclability-relevant design data
    • Log what is missing and refuse silent substitutions — a second letterhead PDF is not an answer
    • Anchor it contractually — make per-reference conformity documentation a condition of purchase
    • File everything against the packaging reference — registrations, declarations and data live together

    How EPRPilot helps

    EPRPilot stores declarations, supplier evidence and technical data per packaging reference and links them to your SKUs and markets — so when a customer or an inspector asks, you produce the per-packaging documentation in minutes, not weeks.

    Können Sie eine Konformitätserklärung in 10 Tagen vorlegen?

    Sehen Sie, wie EPRPilot Verpackungsdaten, EPR-Registrierungen und Fristen für alle 27 EU-Märkte an einem Ort bündelt.